Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/ a Columbus blog Mon, 07 May 2012 16:59:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1767 mandy mills Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:40:26 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1767 Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog<br>before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me. <br><a href="http://mingle2.com" rel="nofollow">dateing sites</a> Hello! I could have sworn I’ve been to this blog
before but after browsing through some of the post I realized it’s new to me.
dateing sites

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1675 free dating sites Sat, 26 Jun 2010 22:06:11 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1675 This entry was posted by Vasile Filat on Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009 at 12:00 am and is filed under Doctrine, Practical advice.<br><br><b> <a href="http://www.sixsingles.com/" title="free dating sites" rel="nofollow">free dating sites</a></b> This entry was posted by Vasile Filat on Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009 at 12:00 am and is filed under Doctrine, Practical advice.

free dating sites

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1670 free dating sites Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:43:34 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1670 new content with its most recent post in early August 2009<br><br><b> <a href="http://www.sixsingles.com/" title="free dating sites" rel="nofollow">free dating sites</a></b> new content with its most recent post in early August 2009

free dating sites

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1433 Andy Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:19:54 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1433 I see indiecolumbus is really cranking out new content with its most recent post in early August 2009. Maybe it's time to start stealing content. I see indiecolumbus is really cranking out new content with its most recent post in early August 2009. Maybe it's time to start stealing content.

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1432 seriesoftubes Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:37:37 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1432 also fair use ++. quit bitching about how the internet works, its hypertext, your article being discussed on another site that links to your article is a Good Thing. Thats how you get visitors to your site. They clickity click from other places on the internet. Did you honestly invite everyone to your website personally? no they clickity clicked from the interwebs. its only copyright infringement if a substantial portion of the material is being recreated with attribution. a paragraph and a link to your content is something you should be greatful for on the internet. it means someone is visiting or site and someone cares about your meaningless internet babble. Why are you going to shoot your self in the foot and complain that people are advertising your pointless articles. (as if your opinion on anything really matters you self important douchebags). god you guys need some marketing skills, some blogging skills, some internet skills, some legal skills, something. also fair use ++. quit bitching about how the internet works, its hypertext, your article being discussed on another site that links to your article is a Good Thing. Thats how you get visitors to your site. They clickity click from other places on the internet. Did you honestly invite everyone to your website personally? no they clickity clicked from the interwebs. its only copyright infringement if a substantial portion of the material is being recreated with attribution. a paragraph and a link to your content is something you should be greatful for on the internet. it means someone is visiting or site and someone cares about your meaningless internet babble. Why are you going to shoot your self in the foot and complain that people are advertising your pointless articles. (as if your opinion on anything really matters you self important douchebags). god you guys need some marketing skills, some blogging skills, some internet skills, some legal skills, something.

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1431 dublinohguest Sat, 18 Jul 2009 18:32:34 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1431 i dont read either, i got hear from a random google search but i would like to chime in and explain something about blogging technology. You should be familar with a feature called trackback. Its a mechanism to facilitate this type of syndication or aggregation of content. Essentially the software you use, say for instance wordpress, pings the quoted site. Thats just how blogging works, you stumble across some other blog, you might find it interesting enough to discuss or share, you do so, either outright or your opinion of it, you link to it, you ping it back with a trackback so the original article can see who is talking about it. Welcome to the blogosphere. learn 2 internet noobs. i dont read either, i got hear from a random google search but i would like to chime in and explain something about blogging technology. You should be familar with a feature called trackback. Its a mechanism to facilitate this type of syndication or aggregation of content. Essentially the software you use, say for instance wordpress, pings the quoted site. Thats just how blogging works, you stumble across some other blog, you might find it interesting enough to discuss or share, you do so, either outright or your opinion of it, you link to it, you ping it back with a trackback so the original article can see who is talking about it. Welcome to the blogosphere. learn 2 internet noobs.

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1334 Carl Wed, 27 May 2009 14:56:17 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1334 nuff said! nuff said!

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1333 Andy Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:54:51 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1333 Jon, You exemplify the Columbus Underground community. Instead of engaging the issue at hand, you still resort to name calling. I guess that is the only way that you can defend your friend's actions which, in the end, is no justification at all. The only thing that is preventing anyone from discussing the issue is themselves. While I disagree with your characterization of what I immediately did, I had every right to threaten legal action. It was my property that was being taken and CU.com had no right to use it. Instead of offering to take down my copy and photos, Cu.com wanted to somehow justify their use of it. When it became apparent that Cu.com had a sense of entitlement to what was mine, I threatened legal action. Btw, the original threat was not directed at Cu.com but to another website that had stolen my content. The best way I've heard this all summed up is that I'm dealing with a bunch of kids who feel that just because something is on the internet, it is theirs for the plundering. If people are offended by threats of legal action, perhaps they shouldn't violate the law in the first place. Jon, You exemplify the Columbus Underground community. Instead of engaging the issue at hand, you still resort to name calling. I guess that is the only way that you can defend your friend's actions which, in the end, is no justification at all. The only thing that is preventing anyone from discussing the issue is themselves. While I disagree with your characterization of what I immediately did, I had every right to threaten legal action. It was my property that was being taken and CU.com had no right to use it. Instead of offering to take down my copy and photos, Cu.com wanted to somehow justify their use of it. When it became apparent that Cu.com had a sense of entitlement to what was mine, I threatened legal action. Btw, the original threat was not directed at Cu.com but to another website that had stolen my content. The best way I've heard this all summed up is that I'm dealing with a bunch of kids who feel that just because something is on the internet, it is theirs for the plundering. If people are offended by threats of legal action, perhaps they shouldn't violate the law in the first place.

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1332 Jon Myers Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:00:28 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1332 Andy, I called you a stupe and would stand by that anytime online or in person. I use my real name and don't hide behind some clown style, dungeons and dragons false name. Ironically, I agreed with you on many levels. Anyhow, you wasted an opportunity to make a valid point and create conversation around it. Plain and simple. I believe the reason it was wasted is because you immediately started posturing as a lawyer and dropping the SUE bomb. Aside from being childish and a major distraction to the point being made, that sort of garden-variety legal posturing immediately shuts down conversation. Shutting down conversation when you want people to discuss and understand you're point of view is - stupid. It's contrary to the concept of community. Whenever things immediately shut down and digress to legal dramatics they'll generate equally proportionate, digressive remarks. It wasn't a "disagreement". You were threatening legal action immediately. What ticks me off is we could be discussing the actual point you were trying to make. Andy, I called you a stupe and would stand by that anytime online or in person. I use my real name and don't hide behind some clown style, dungeons and dragons false name. Ironically, I agreed with you on many levels. Anyhow, you wasted an opportunity to make a valid point and create conversation around it. Plain and simple. I believe the reason it was wasted is because you immediately started posturing as a lawyer and dropping the SUE bomb. Aside from being childish and a major distraction to the point being made, that sort of garden-variety legal posturing immediately shuts down conversation. Shutting down conversation when you want people to discuss and understand you're point of view is – stupid. It's contrary to the concept of community. Whenever things immediately shut down and digress to legal dramatics they'll generate equally proportionate, digressive remarks. It wasn't a "disagreement". You were threatening legal action immediately. What ticks me off is we could be discussing the actual point you were trying to make.

]]> Valium For Sale http://the270.com/2009/02/24/is-columbus-underground-the-800-pound-gorilla-in-the-room/comment-page-1/#comment-1331 Andy Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:05:42 +0000 http://the270.com/?p=762#comment-1331 Beyond the copyright infringement issue, I find interesting what took place here on a broader level and what that may say about our society. We basically had two individuals engaged in a disagreement. The issue at hand was the use of photos and content on a website without permission. At some point during the discussion, one individual decided that he could no longer engage in that discussion. So he decided to make a post on his blog about the discussion. The title of that post was words to the effect of: FineRepast doesn't want CU.com linking to his site anymore. The content of that post was words to the effect of: He's mad; he's lashing out, he's angry; and he's threatening lawsuits as a result of that link. Last I checked, the post was gone so forgive me if I'm slightly off. He didn't stop there. He also put up the same post for discussion in his forum. He may have also alerted others to the discussion via tweets and other social networking media. Now it's common for all of us to seek alliances from our friends when we are engaged in a disagreement. We want to hear from our friends that we are in the right and the other party is in the wrong. In seeking that alliance, we put the best spin on the story to quickly gain their alliance. Go back and look at the original issue and then look at what it became. Anyone who read the headline of the blog post or discussion topic would quickly conclude that this guy at finerepast.com is a real jerk. Let's go kick his ass for picking on our friend and complaining about being linked to. How many who read that actually tried to determine what the complete story was? 3% or less? In fact, only one person that I am aware of at CU.com actually stopped to consider whether I had a valid point and what the whole story was. Most people who responded immediately jumped on the bandwagon and got their punches and kicks in through vulgar name-calling. I immediately recall Stupe, Douchebag, Asshole and Asshat to name a few. I applaud the loyalty to a friend, but at what cost? Before we hide behind the anonymity of our computer screen and lob verbal grenades in aid of our friend perhaps we should ask ourselves - do we really understand the complete story? Is this how I would act in person? And is this the type of person I want to be known as? Beyond the copyright infringement issue, I find interesting what took place here on a broader level and what that may say about our society. We basically had two individuals engaged in a disagreement. The issue at hand was the use of photos and content on a website without permission. At some point during the discussion, one individual decided that he could no longer engage in that discussion. So he decided to make a post on his blog about the discussion. The title of that post was words to the effect of: FineRepast doesn't want CU.com linking to his site anymore. The content of that post was words to the effect of: He's mad; he's lashing out, he's angry; and he's threatening lawsuits as a result of that link. Last I checked, the post was gone so forgive me if I'm slightly off. He didn't stop there. He also put up the same post for discussion in his forum. He may have also alerted others to the discussion via tweets and other social networking media. Now it's common for all of us to seek alliances from our friends when we are engaged in a disagreement. We want to hear from our friends that we are in the right and the other party is in the wrong. In seeking that alliance, we put the best spin on the story to quickly gain their alliance. Go back and look at the original issue and then look at what it became. Anyone who read the headline of the blog post or discussion topic would quickly conclude that this guy at finerepast.com is a real jerk. Let's go kick his ass for picking on our friend and complaining about being linked to. How many who read that actually tried to determine what the complete story was? 3% or less? In fact, only one person that I am aware of at CU.com actually stopped to consider whether I had a valid point and what the whole story was. Most people who responded immediately jumped on the bandwagon and got their punches and kicks in through vulgar name-calling. I immediately recall Stupe, Douchebag, Asshole and Asshat to name a few. I applaud the loyalty to a friend, but at what cost? Before we hide behind the anonymity of our computer screen and lob verbal grenades in aid of our friend perhaps we should ask ourselves – do we really understand the complete story? Is this how I would act in person? And is this the type of person I want to be known as?

]]>